diff --git a/How-reCAPTCHA-v3-Scoring-Works.md b/How-reCAPTCHA-v3-Scoring-Works.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd9658e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/How-reCAPTCHA-v3-Scoring-Works.md
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+
Teams migrating from 2Captcha usually expect a painful migration. In reality, because CapSkip emulates the familiar request format, the change comes down to largely a matter of endpoints and keeping everything else as it was.
A migration plan makes the switch smooth: point the endpoint at CapSkip, confirm a few real solves, then cut over production. Because the API mirrors popular services, most of the work is essentially done.
Proxy support are essential for real automation, and CapSkip plays nicely with proxies without fuss. Teams can route traffic however your setup requires while and still solving CAPTCHAs on your own machine, which keeps behavior consistent across runs.
QA engineers run into CAPTCHAs as well, particularly on staging sites that mirror production. Instead of disabling those tests, they are able to have CapSkip handle the challenge so coverage stays complete.
Automated browsers expose fingerprints which anti-bot systems watch for, which is why pairing solid browser hygiene with dependable CAPTCHA solving matters. CapSkip handles the challenge half while your team concentrate on the rest.
Data collection is one of the most common reasons teams adopt a CAPTCHA solver. One stalled request can halt an entire run, so solving challenges automatically keeps the pipeline steady. CapSkip slots into such pipelines cleanly.
Coming off CapSolver tends to be just as smooth: aim the scripts at CapSkip, preserve the flow, and trade per-solve charges for one predictable price. The migration is usually done in a short session, not days.
A major benefits of processing locally comes down to price. Most services charge per solve, so your costs rise the moment throughput grows. CapSkip goes with flat-rate pricing and uncapped solves, so scaling does not mean watching the meter.
A Selenium setup remains a go-to for browser automation, and CapSkip drops into it cleanly. You keep the WebDriver logic as is and delegate the challenge to CapSkip whenever one appears, so the run keeps going without human steps.
Automated browsers leave signals which anti-bot systems watch for, so combining careful automation hygiene with dependable CAPTCHA solving counts. CapSkip handles the solving half so your team focus on the browser side.
Data collection is among the most common reasons people reach for a CAPTCHA solver. A single blocked page will halt an entire job, so solving challenges automatically keeps throughput predictable. CapSkip slots into such pipelines neatly.
Under the hood, reCAPTCHA v3 hands out a score based on observed behavior rather than a one checkbox. Getting a usable token takes a solver built for that approach, which is exactly what CapSkip is built for.
GeeTest challenges can be notoriously awkward for automation, which is why running a solver that covers them helps a lot. CapSkip solves GeeTest on your machine, so workflows that depend on these targets do not break when the challenge shows up.
Data collection is among the most common use cases teams adopt a CAPTCHA solver. One blocked page can halt an whole run, so solving challenges automatically keeps throughput predictable. CapSkip slots into these workflows neatly.
Fundamentally, a CAPTCHA solver interprets a challenge and produces the solution a site is looking for, so an automated script can keep going. What sets CapSkip apart is that the work stays locally - nothing is shipped off to a stranger, and there are no per-CAPTCHA fees. That combination of control and flat pricing is hard to beat for serious automation.
Image CAPTCHAs are still extremely common, from sign-up pages to checkout screens. CapSkip recognizes a huge range of image CAPTCHA types locally, typically in about a tenth of a second. This throughput adds up the moment you process high volumes.
Fundamentally, a CAPTCHA solver reads a challenge and produces the answer a site expects, so an automated tool can continue. What sets [CapSkip](https://Bagseazunsocial.com/author-profile/elizabethgoodi/) apart is everything happens on your own Windows machine - no challenge data is shipped off to a stranger, and you avoid per-solve charges. That combination of control and flat pricing turns out to be hard to beat for steady workloads.
The developer API is designed to emulate the request format of major CAPTCHA-solving services. In practical terms, scripts and scripts that already target other services are able to point at CapSkip with minimal changes and no new code.
Datacenter IP pools and datacenter proxies behave in different ways under anti-bot scrutiny. Regardless of which blend your setup uses, CapSkip handles the CAPTCHA locally without adding an external dependency to the path.
Classic image and text CAPTCHAs are still extremely common, on sign-up pages to checkout flows. CapSkip recognizes a huge range of image CAPTCHA types locally, typically in about a tenth of a second. That kind of throughput matters when you handle large volumes.
Concurrent solving becomes the point at which self-hosted tooling truly pays off. Since there is no remote throttle based on your bill, teams can fan out work across many threads and keep keep costs flat.
\ No newline at end of file